<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Between deception and earnestness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communi-k.net/advertising/2010/02/between-deception-and-earnestness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communi-k.net/advertising/2010/02/between-deception-and-earnestness/</link>
	<description>A KGBTexas Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:59:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KH</title>
		<link>http://www.communi-k.net/advertising/2010/02/between-deception-and-earnestness/comment-page-1/#comment-6107</link>
		<dc:creator>KH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communi-k.net/?p=1869#comment-6107</guid>
		<description>I think that it is more of an attempt at transparency and honesty, which is being pushed through social media and the drastic shift to two-way communication.
 
I don&#039;t think Domino&#039;s should be pinged because they admitted they could do better. And did.  I actually give them credit for admitting it.  However, as a marketer, I don&#039;t agree with the advertising strategy that they used to communicate the change.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a &quot;corporate cover up&quot; or a means of manipulation. I think it&#039;s companies struggling with the whole &quot;transparency&quot; and open communication strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is more of an attempt at transparency and honesty, which is being pushed through social media and the drastic shift to two-way communication.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Domino&#8217;s should be pinged because they admitted they could do better. And did.  I actually give them credit for admitting it.  However, as a marketer, I don&#8217;t agree with the advertising strategy that they used to communicate the change.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a &#8220;corporate cover up&#8221; or a means of manipulation. I think it&#8217;s companies struggling with the whole &#8220;transparency&#8221; and open communication strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

